Before reading The New Digital Age, I did not realize
how much technology played a role on serious situations in the world. I never
looked at social media as an outlet to start revolutions, did not expect the
virtual world to progress on the same level as the physical world, and did not
think of terrorism happening virtually. The book makes some great points about
how much power technology holds, and what it can be used for. I believe the
most interesting topics were the future of revolutions, future of terrorism and
reconstruction. These are both distinctive concepts that have a completely
different meaning from the original definition when using technology to execute
them. The thought of a social media revolution is new due to the vast awareness
that it causes. It is great for getting information out quickly, keeping those
people who do not watch the news in the loop about serious and far situations,
and causing picture movements. However, will technology develop to the point where
social media is actually used as an outlet to solve problems and not just bring
awareness to them?
As
far as virtually causing terrorism and virtually kidnapping people’s identity,
will these problems start to occur on a regular basis? I remember when cyber
bullying started to take place, and became such a huge ordeal because it drastically
affected people’s lives. Will cyber terrorism and virtual kidnapping be held to
a higher standard of crime, or will it be even harder to prove? We discussed in
class which would be more terrifying, being kidnapped in the physical or in the
virtual. The virtual causes more complications when dealing a person’s identity
and can cause long term damage. Have we given too much power to the use of
technology? But what about RFID chips? If we put chips in everything like humans,
weapons, and eventually be able to track someone’s use of the internet, can
virtual kidnaps be minimized. What will
be the next phase of technology?
No comments:
Post a Comment