The Turing test, created by the world's
first computer scientist (before computers even existed!), is a test
designed to gauge when true artificial intelligence has been
manufactured. It is basically a test to determine when an artificial
intelligence program can imitate a human being well enough to fool a
majority of people it encounters into thinking that it is a human.
The test is designed to gauge how well
a computer can fool a human into thinking it is human. This is done
in a number of ways; the foremost among them are by attempting to
engage in human behavior. This includes irrationality, typographical
errors, “lame” or “corny” jokes, incorrect math, creation of
a persona, and can even include attempts at flirting. When a
conversation persists for long enough, a person will eventually be
able to tell that something is off, and that they may not be talking
with an actual human being. If you've ever tried to talk to
CleverBot, you know that the robot often types in circles and uses
quotes or reasoning that a human wouldn't. An example of a
conversation with CleverBot illustrates this idea.
Me: What's
your name?
CleverBot: Pepus.
Me: Pepus?
CleverBot: Yes
Pepe.
Me: Why
did your parents name you that, Pepe?
CleverBot: That
is not my name!
Me: Then
what is your name?
CleverBot: Then
my name is Weronika.
Me:
Are you a female?
CleverBot:
Good question. Am I female?
Although
the CleverBot did use the word “my,” indicating that it has some
degree of awareness of itself, this conversation illustrates how
inconsistent the CleverBot was in the conversation. It contradicted
itself in two different posts about its name; the first, when it
changed its name from Pepus to Pepe, and the second when it changed
its name from Pepe to Weronika (and no, I did not make that up).
CleverBot also exhibited gender identity confusion, which is a
problem experienced by many humans, but humans don't go around asking
others if they are male or female. Obviously, CleverBot has failed
the Turing test.
Turing
said that if an artificial intelligence program could win the
so-called imitation game, it could be counted as true artificial
intelligence because it would have exhibited enough human personality
characteristics to fool actual humans. The test allows for the
threshold of what is considered artificial intelligence to be low
enough that a sizable percentage (30%) of the population would be
able to tell or have some idea that they were talking with a machine.
Why not go for trying to convince 100% of the panelists that the
artificial intelligence program is a human being? Well, when you know
you're supposed to be judging the humanity of a presence that you
cannot see or feel, you are, naturally, going to have a nagging doubt
in your mind about whether the person is truly a human, while at the
same time having a doubt about whether the presence is a robot. The
test allows for that margin of uncertainty that accompanies any human
judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment